Climb in, though, and the differences feel huge. The biggest difference is in overall length, and even that's only a hand's width difference. The spec sheet shows that the dimensions of these two are nearly the same. The C-HR is undeniably cooler, and Toyota has shown before (with vehicles like the Solara) that there are buyers who want its wares with some pizzaz. Inside, the two have similar design themes, mainly the near-identical infotainment screen stack, steering wheel, and gauges, but C-HR continues its embrace of quirk with teardrop shapes from the headliner to the (adjustable) cupholders. The C-HR's quasi-coupe design that hides the rear door handles gives buyers an affordable entry point to the crossover coupe style that is otherwise reserved for luxury model shoppers. It's still better looking than the RAV4, with fewer of the RAV's overdone surfaces and just enough character in the creases coming from the front and rear fenders, but it can't stack up to the C-HR as far as funkiness. The Corolla Cross is the newcomer, joining the C-HR as a much more conventional-looking crossover. Here's how the two stack up, and for bargain shoppers, both of our testers were base-spec models, not the usual loaded rides. The C-HR and Corolla Cross are similar on the spec sheet and the window sticker, but very different in how they go about their business. Today, Toyota has two subcompact crossovers to pick from instead. In the late '90s, you could walk down to your local Toyota showroom and pick from two different subcompact coupes and a handful of sedans.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |